Suwaldiman Suwaldiman, Irlya Noerofi Tyas


This research was conducted because the consideration of the widespread of students’ corruptive behavior in term of academic misconducts. This research examines the impact of students’ academic performance on their corruptive behavior perception. The data samples are the accounting students of Economics Faculty of Universitas Islam Indonesia. The corruptive behavior is defined as the academic misconducts that are usually done by students. It is measured by their tolerance perception of the academic misconducts. The academic performance is defined and measured as the students’ achievements on the subjects undertaken. These are represented by grade point average (GPA), grade of financial accounting and auditing subjects. A regression analysis is employed to test whether those academic performance have significant impact to the corruptive behavior perception. Based on the analysis, it is found that the GPA and the grade of financial accounting subjects have a positive and significant impact on the corruptive behavior perception. It is suggested that the better performance achieved by students on GPA and these subjects, the better their perception of corruptive behavior. However, this research does not prove that the grades of auditing subjects have a significant impact on the corruptive behavior perceive.


academic misconduct, academic performance, corruptive behavior

Full Text:



Abraham, S., & Karns, L. (2009). Do business schools value the competencies that businesses value? The Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 84 No. 6, pp. 350–356.

Allen, W. R., Bacdayan, P., Kowalski, B. P. K., & Roy, H. (2005). Examining the impact of ethics training on business student values. Education and Training. Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 170–182.

Chen, YJ., & Tang, TL.(2006). Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among university students. Journal of Business Ethics. Vo. 69 pp. 77–93.

Dion, M. (2010). What is corruption corrupting? A philosophical viewpoint. Journal of Money Laundering Control. Vol.13, No. 1, pp. 45-54.

Freire, C.(2014).Academic misconduct among Portuguese economics and business undergraduate students: A comparative analysis with other major students. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 12, pp. 43-63.

McCabe, L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education. Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 294–305.

McKibban, AR & Burdsal, CA.(2013). Academic dishonesty: An in-depth investigation of assessing measurable constructs and a call for consistency in scholarship. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 11, pp. 185-197.

Mirshekary, S., & Lawrence, AD.(2009). Academic and business ethical misconduct and cultural values: A cross national comparison. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 7, pp. 141-157.

Rienties, B., Beausaert, S., & Grohnert, T.(2012). Understanding academic performance of international students: The role of ethnicity, academic and social integration. Higher Education. Vol. 63 pp. 685–700.

Stone, TH., Jawahar, IM., & Kismaro, JL.(2009).Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International. Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 221-241.

Kieso, D.E., Jerry,J. W., & Terry, D.W.(2014). Intermediate accounting IFRS edition: 2nd Edition. John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Williams, S., Tanner, M., Beard, J., & Chacko, J. (2014). Academic misconduct among business students: A comparison of the US and UAE. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 12, pp. 65-73.

Yousef, DA. (2013). Predicting the performance of undergraduate business students in introductory quantitative methods courses: The case of a private university in the UAE. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 359-371.

Zekos, G.I.(2004). Ethics versus corruption in globalization. Journal of Management Development. Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 631-47.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.